A Controversial Star Trek opinion

Star Trek related discussion, information, links, etc.

Moderator: Dancyer McCoy

Forum rules
You are free to offer your opinions on a show, episode, book, film, film series, cinematic universe, etc., as long as it applies to that item, and not to the stated or assumed political views of the producers, writers, actors, key grip, best boy, intern, etc., of said item. In short, you want to talk about a show or movie, talk about the show or movie.

Others are free to disagree with your opinion. (You are not entitled to express your opinion in a vacuum.) BUT that opposing opinion must follow the same requirements above that the original opinion had to follow, as well as not bringing in the assumed political views of the original poster. (I leave out "stated" as they should not state any political position here on STPMA.)

ALSO, do not toss about derogatory labels at someone who offers an opinion in opposition to yours. No name calling, political labels (SJW, etc.,) questioning their humanity, morality, ethics, true fan status, or your assumption they are in the business to protect a certain fandom (gatekeeping, etc.). Again, discuss the show or movie not the politics or motives of another poster.

If you dislike something, it's perfectly fine to say so. However, posting your dislike every time someone else says anything positive about a show or movie, essentially stating the same thing over and over again is not acceptable. If you have something new to add, or are replying to a specific point in someone else's comment, okay. But if it's just to state once again, "IT SUCKS!" Don't.
Post Reply
User avatar
Joseph A Human
Crewman 1st Class
Crewman 1st Class
Posts: 32
Joined: Sat Aug 01, 2020 1:00 pm
Location: Britain Planet Earth

A Controversial Star Trek opinion

Post by Joseph A Human » Wed Sep 16, 2020 5:57 am

As much as I love The Next Generation I have never really liked the exterior design of the Enterprise D.

I like how it looks inside and it's the starship I'd want to live on board, but the D has always felt overly big and bulky especially compared with the original Enterprise design, which for me is still the best looking ship in all of Trek.

Also I have always thought the Saucer section on the D looks like a head a size too big for the body it's attached to.

There I've said it, I feel better now.
Live Long and well you know the rest... \w/ ((\ufp/))

User avatar
Gazomg
Commodore
Commodore
Posts: 2249
Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2010 1:11 am
Location: The Emerald Isle
Contact:

Re: A Controversial Star Trek opinion

Post by Gazomg » Wed Sep 16, 2020 10:08 am

I get the love for the original enterprise as at the time the design was incredible, and still looks good today, but the b, c, and d versions were all decent but were never going to capture what the initial one had, even if its dated now.
Image
MANIPULATIONS ON MY SITE - 3,100 - OCTOBER 28th

User avatar
Michael
Senior Admin
Senior Admin
Posts: 13461
Joined: Fri May 20, 2005 10:32 pm
Location: North of the North Pole
Contact:

Re: A Controversial Star Trek opinion

Post by Michael » Wed Sep 16, 2020 7:21 pm

Joseph A Human wrote:
Wed Sep 16, 2020 5:57 am
Also I have always thought the Saucer section on the D looks like a head a size too big for the body it's attached to.
I agree.

Aside from the original, for me it's a tie between the B and C.
-Michael Gray
Image
"In Great Deeds Something Abides"

User avatar
sirus
Lieutenant Commander
Lieutenant Commander
Posts: 806
Joined: Tue Sep 08, 2009 2:21 am
Location: In a van by the river, stealing your wi-fi

Re: A Controversial Star Trek opinion

Post by sirus » Thu Sep 17, 2020 7:29 am

I tend to favor the original or the E. I just love the E.

The F was okay, but I guess non-canon now.

The A was the same as the original refit. The B was just an Excelsior. The C was fine, I just never had much love for the Ambassador class, looks too much like a Galaxy-class with angles.

The Galaxy-class looks weird to me. I don't like its deflector array, I don't like how rounds it is. It always felt bulky and awkward shaped. And yeah, the saucer section is massively oversized.
From ignorance lead me to truth
From darkness lead me to light
From death lead me to immortality

ryjuda.deviantart.com

JM1776
Federation Ambassador
Federation Ambassador
Posts: 13952
Joined: Tue Nov 15, 2005 4:27 pm
Location: Pennsyltucky
Contact:

Re: A Controversial Star Trek opinion

Post by JM1776 » Sun Sep 20, 2020 11:16 am

But it really does look like the only ship that should have families aboard.
The Bull is the GOAT.

Vamos Rafa!

User avatar
Lionheart
Command Master Chief Petty Officer
Command Master Chief Petty Officer
Posts: 675
Joined: Fri Mar 10, 2006 6:56 pm
Location: Ambridge, PA
Contact:

Re: A Controversial Star Trek opinion

Post by Lionheart » Sun Sep 20, 2020 12:35 pm

I feel it sets it apart from what came before, representing a new era and ideas, and the hope for peacefully exploring the galaxy.
Didn't work out for them though...
"We'' settle this the old Navy way. First guy to die, loses!" - President Thomas "Tug" Benson

User avatar
amehatrekkie
-the weird one-
-the weird one-
Posts: 10608
Joined: Tue Jan 08, 2008 9:53 pm
Location: Earth, North American Continent, Southeast USA

Re: A Controversial Star Trek opinion

Post by amehatrekkie » Tue Oct 20, 2020 8:40 am

It's my favorite design
Ahmie K-[ay][aka Adam Kriegel], Captain of the Department of Weird yea i'm weird
STPMA WORLDBUILDING EXPERT[ RIP MJ!!] Normal people scare meAging is inevitable, maturity is optional
https://imgur.com/a/bUvNm

User avatar
Bry_Sinclair
Fleet Captain
Fleet Captain
Posts: 1930
Joined: Sun Jun 11, 2006 1:53 am
Location: Lerwick, Shetland, Scotland

Re: A Controversial Star Trek opinion

Post by Bry_Sinclair » Wed Oct 21, 2020 3:06 pm

The E-D is far too top heavy for me, with too much emphasis given to the saucer than to the drive section or nacelles.

I really wish they'd used the Ambassador-Class (ie the one we actually saw in action) for the design of the ship, as it's far better proportioned.
Avatar: Captain Adele Beaumont, [i]U.S.S. Shepard[/i]
Artist: gazomg

User avatar
Ronin
Lieutenant Commander
Lieutenant Commander
Posts: 875
Joined: Thu Aug 17, 2006 10:20 am
Location: Inbetween coming and going

Re: A Controversial Star Trek opinion

Post by Ronin » Wed Oct 21, 2020 8:05 pm

You don't like your gi - I mean ships top heavy?

:D
There is no teacher but the enemy... and no enemy greater than myself...

User avatar
Bry_Sinclair
Fleet Captain
Fleet Captain
Posts: 1930
Joined: Sun Jun 11, 2006 1:53 am
Location: Lerwick, Shetland, Scotland

Re: A Controversial Star Trek opinion

Post by Bry_Sinclair » Wed Oct 21, 2020 9:47 pm

Ronin wrote:
Wed Oct 21, 2020 8:05 pm
You don't like your gi - I mean ships top heavy?

:D
Not into them at all, I prefer when they're packing plenty down below :lol:
Avatar: Captain Adele Beaumont, [i]U.S.S. Shepard[/i]
Artist: gazomg

User avatar
Gazomg
Commodore
Commodore
Posts: 2249
Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2010 1:11 am
Location: The Emerald Isle
Contact:

Re: A Controversial Star Trek opinion

Post by Gazomg » Thu Oct 22, 2020 4:20 pm

keep your stick insects.....a woman should have curves, cushion for the pushin
Image
MANIPULATIONS ON MY SITE - 3,100 - OCTOBER 28th

User avatar
Lionheart
Command Master Chief Petty Officer
Command Master Chief Petty Officer
Posts: 675
Joined: Fri Mar 10, 2006 6:56 pm
Location: Ambridge, PA
Contact:

Re: A Controversial Star Trek opinion

Post by Lionheart » Fri Oct 23, 2020 10:31 am

Bry_Sinclair wrote:
Wed Oct 21, 2020 9:47 pm
Ronin wrote:
Wed Oct 21, 2020 8:05 pm
You don't like your gi - I mean ships top heavy?

:D
Not into them at all, I prefer when they're packing plenty down below :lol:
I think you can get that in the Philippines and Singapore pretty cheap.
"We'' settle this the old Navy way. First guy to die, loses!" - President Thomas "Tug" Benson

User avatar
Bry_Sinclair
Fleet Captain
Fleet Captain
Posts: 1930
Joined: Sun Jun 11, 2006 1:53 am
Location: Lerwick, Shetland, Scotland

Re: A Controversial Star Trek opinion

Post by Bry_Sinclair » Fri Oct 23, 2020 3:17 pm

Lionheart wrote:
Fri Oct 23, 2020 10:31 am
I think you can get that in the Philippines and Singapore pretty cheap.
So long as it's attached to a bearded bear that likes to cuddle then I'm all for it :D
Avatar: Captain Adele Beaumont, [i]U.S.S. Shepard[/i]
Artist: gazomg

JM1776
Federation Ambassador
Federation Ambassador
Posts: 13952
Joined: Tue Nov 15, 2005 4:27 pm
Location: Pennsyltucky
Contact:

Re: A Controversial Star Trek opinion

Post by JM1776 » Sat Oct 24, 2020 9:00 am

Wow.

Not interested in any of your preferences, people, so ... let's move on, shall we?
The Bull is the GOAT.

Vamos Rafa!

Post Reply